Arrgh
So, I call the ex psych doc's office because I want a copy of my file. There's no particular reason, really, except that it documents a 5 years period of my life in a psych-med induced haze that partially fried my memory. I might want to refer to it, for example, every time some new revelation about pharmaceutical company lies are revealed or I experience some health issue and want to look back at that for possible causes.
Which may be the problem. Hahaha
I left a message and got a call back from office staff, saying nope. "Why?" I asked, and was met with silence, prompting me to ask if the caller was even still on the phone, let alone the planet. I asked again, and was told that office policy was that they only release to other doctors.
I'm not a huge conspiracy theorist, but I am a skeptic. My records, of my treatment, and I don't have access to them?
So I asked what am I supposed to do if, say 30 years in the future (when he is dead, I think privately) a doctor does need those records? "Oh, we destroy them after 7 years."
Sure ya do. And that serves the patient, right? Not you, not pharma. Right? Let the conspiracy begin!
And I look up law/statute stuff on this, and because I'm no lawyer, I can only vaguely comprehend the general stuff. (I say 'vaguely' because in law-speak, a perfectly normal sounding everyday word that you think you know the meaning of can have it's own special convoluted definition. Because law, like medicine, is here to serve the public. Hahaha)
Okay, so law sez they're not my property. And I should be able to request a copy, with exceptions. Exceptions? Lemme look further at some state law looking stuff...
However, copies of a patient's records shall not be furnished to such patient when the patient's treating physician or clinical psychologist, in the exercise of professional judgment, has made a part of the patient's records a written statement that in his opinion the furnishing to or review by the patient of such records would be reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the patient or another person, or that such health records make reference to a person, other than a health care provider, and the access requested would be reasonably likely to cause substantial harm to such referenced person.Seeing as how the files are now in storage, says office person, it's not like anyone pulled them to find a note saying "Oh Noes! Don't ever let her read this shit as it would endanger humans!" Rather, it is assumed that simply being a consumer of mental services that I am by default a scary person. Like being on that crap for 5 years was a walk in the park and it would be seeing my records, and not the actual hell that was life-on-meds, that would send me over the edge.
Fuckers.
I'm just fuming, is all.


7 comments:
indeed it is fucked - but i bet if you persist (and we know you do, mankers) you can get them. it's the classic 'say whatever nonsense suits you because the dope will just accept it and go away and you can get back on with the important job of sitting on your arse' syndrome adopted by gatekeepers everywhere. speak to their supervisor. obviously once you actually get to soemone important, THEN you'll be up against the real conspiracy and maybe have some real fun...
I may be stating the obvious, but...
I tend to agree with the last writer. If you're persistent enough (especially if you go in in person), and you've done research on state law, then confront them with what you know and say, I want a copy of my records, and unless said records include a statement from my former psychologist that I am not to have access to the records, then you have to give me those records by state law. And if the records do include such a statement, try to get all records that aren't covered by the statement, and bug your former psych. to ask if he'll release the records.
Thanks, lost clown. And simply wondered, that kind of cheering on works nicely for me!
Ray, yeah, I know it's the obvious. :) I usually have to navigate through 'fuming' to expose the clear path to 'obvious'. You're comment pretty much accurately expresses where I ended up.
I found the statute, and then a nicely formatted pdf release form on an area non-profit legal assistance web site. I'm not even going to talk to supervisors and whatnot, it's just quack and an office assistant. Surely they have such a form, but they chose to blow me off when initially asked. So, all they're going to get is a googled, completed, and hand delivered form tomorrow. Any verbal comment or excuse will be met with the one response: "You're free to respond... as statute dictates".
Thanks all for sitting through the rant. I appreciate it bunches.
manxome take straight line - she good.
Does the straight line stop at the mail box, SW? (looks down, scratching toes in dirt)
and will you update us (even tho it's not really any of our business)?
hmn.... do you have another doc whom you trust who could request the records for you?
Post a Comment